Research
Working Papers
- Clicks or Comments? The quality-quantity trade-off of review systems2026
I study the optimal design of review systems. A platform learns a product’s quality from user-generated reviews. It faces a trade-off between the informativeness and frequency of reviews. Detailed reviews are individually more informative but less frequently submitted than simple reviews. I characterize the informational content of review systems, which depends on the information in each review and their submission rate. I use this characterization to derive the platform’s optimal review system and show how it varies with reviewers’ preference heterogeneity. In particular, when reviewers are homogeneous the platform isolates “horrible" experiences instead of differentiating between “good" and “bad" experiences.
Works in Progress
- Market Structure and the Distribution of Content2026
I study how market structure influences the distribution of entertainment products. When producers compete for attention, ex-ante uncertainty over their quality causes producers to inefficiently sort across horizontally differentiated products (“genres"). In the competitive equilibrium, production is inefficiently concentrated in high-demand, homogeneous, genres. Flat pricing alleviates this inefficiency when genres are ex-ante similar in quality, but aggravates this inefficiency when genres are ex-ante different. Merging producers into an integrated platform restores efficiency. Recommendation systems are able to sometimes improve on the competitive equilibrium by suppressing some content.
- Research races: Innovation policy and technological changewith Juan Cruz Llambias2026
R&D subsidies are widely used to foster innovation. Though effective, they require large fiscal outlays. In a model of competitive research, we show that high patent fees can be effective in encouraging firms to focus on disruptive innovations, providing an alternative policy tool. While high fees reduce the payoff from innovating, they encourage firms to focus on large-payoff projects and prevent unbundling of innovations, encouraging to continue development. Additionally, our model provides a simple supply-side explanation for people’s growing mistrust in media: lower sharing costs push firms toward repeatable stories and swift publishing, with less fact-checking and potentially incomplete coverage.